Conviso Platform Evaluation Guide
Use this guide to plan a Conviso Platform proof of concept (PoC). Your Conviso Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) conducts the PoC with your team, using representative applications and workflows from your environment to validate the outcomes that matter to your program.
This guide supports a focused, FDE-led evaluation for security leaders, AppSec teams, engineering representatives, IT, procurement, and compliance stakeholders. It helps the group align on scope, evidence, and a decision before rollout.
Plan your evaluation
Define your evaluation goals
Start with a concrete security or delivery outcome. Identify the first workflow your team needs to improve and the people responsible for assessing it.
| If your priority is | Validate during the PoC | Evidence of success |
|---|---|---|
| Reducing a large findings backlog | Ingestion, deduplication, risk context, ownership, and the vulnerability lifecycle | Findings are consolidated, assigned, and prioritized with useful context |
| Bringing security into delivery | Repository and CI/CD connections, pull request workflows, scan configuration, and Security Gate | Developers receive actionable feedback in their existing delivery workflow |
| Improving application inventory and visibility | Asset inventory, criticality, exposure, ownership, and posture dashboards | Teams can identify owned assets and focus on the risk that matters most |
| Establishing secure design practices | Threat modeling, security requirements, and project execution workflows | Security requirements are traceable from design through execution |
| Coordinating pentests or audits | Projects, evidence, vulnerability tracking, reports, and compliance workflows | Stakeholders can follow findings, evidence, and remediation in one workflow |
| Expanding security testing coverage | The applicable AST, DAST, SBOM, container, AI Pentest, or external scanner workflows | The selected security workflow produces useful, actionable results |
Define success criteria
Agree on how the team will assess each goal before the PoC starts. Keep the scorecard small and use evidence that the people who own the rollout can review together.
| Goal | Test | Evidence to review | Decision owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prioritize risk | Import or generate representative findings | Risk context, ownership, and triage outcome | AppSec owner |
| Fit security into delivery | Connect one repository and delivery workflow | Pull request or pipeline feedback and remediation flow | Engineering representative |
| Confirm operational fit | Use the relevant integrations and access model | Access, notification, and workflow behavior | Platform administrator |
| Validate program value | Review posture or program results | Dashboard, report, and stakeholder feedback | Security leader |
Assemble your evaluation team
Include the people who will operate the workflow and approve its rollout. Your Conviso FDE works with this group to turn the agreed goals into the PoC plan.
| Role | Contribution to the PoC |
|---|---|
| AppSec owner | Defines risk goals, evaluates findings, and approves security outcomes |
| Engineering representative | Selects a representative application and validates developer workflow fit |
| Platform administrator | Configures access, integrations, and service identities |
| Security or program leader | Confirms program value, priorities, and rollout decision |
| Procurement or compliance stakeholder | Reviews commercial, data-handling, and contractual requirements when applicable |
Select representative applications and workflows
Choose a small set of real applications rather than an artificial test project. Include at least one application with an active delivery workflow, a clear owner, and the integrations you expect to use after rollout.
For each application, identify:
- the repository, branch, CI/CD provider, and pull request practice;
- the security workflow to validate, such as AST, DAST, SBOM, Security Gate, AI Pentest, or external finding ingestion;
- the people who own triage and remediation;
- the application criticality, exposure, and business context needed to assess prioritization.